The WordPress theme · version 0.1.1 · GPL v2 or later · free

Read it on the WordPress you have

This theme is the reading page of Quire Ink, driven from WordPress content. It is generated from the blog engine's own stylesheet rather than copied by hand, so what a reader gets is that reading surface and not an impression of it. Install it on the site you already run, live with it for a week, and decide about the engine later.

first visit
152 KB, 0 third parties
palettes
6 each in light and dark
typefaces
6 self-hosted, OFL
needs
6.5 WordPress or newer
locked in
0 tables, types, shortcodes
price
0 GPL v2 or later

01What it is

A reader opens a post and gets one column of about seventy characters in a book face, the article's own contents standing in the gutter beside it, and its facts in the gutter on the other side. They pick one of six palettes, in light or dark, and their choice is remembered on their own device.

Two browser windows side by side: a listing page with a rail of menu, featured posts, categories, archive and tags on the left and a year and month timeline on the right, and an article page with the post's own table of contents on the left and its date, word count, reading time, tags and categories on the right
The listing and an article, at the width that holds three columns. The middle one is the reading measure and the two gutters are what is left. Below that width the gutters fold away on their own and the column takes the screen. There is no second layout: the breakpoint is computed from the reading column rather than typed in.

Nothing on the page is fetched from anybody else. The six typefaces are in the theme, there is no analytics, no avatar service and no font host, so a stranger on a weak signal is waiting for your words and nothing else.

Everything visual is generated from the blog engine's stylesheet, the same sheet the demo renders with: an extractor runs the engine's own emitters and a static check compares bytes, so the theme cannot quietly drift away from the product it came from. It is a classic theme. Settings live in the Customizer, in six panels that name what they do, and there is no Site Editor.

Six tiles of the same article header, three in light schemes named mono, sepia and forest, three in dark schemes named ocean, sci-fi and amber
Six palettes, each carrying light and dark, so a palette that only works in one scheme is not shipped. Every colour comes from the engine and none is written into the theme, which is why they can be checked rather than trusted: all sixty are measured against their own background on every run, and the tightest is 5.01:1 where WCAG AA asks 4.5:1.
Book mode on the left, showing the article set in two columns with a drop cap and a bar carrying the title, two type size controls and a page count; on the right the same article with book typography, its lines justified and hyphenated and its paragraphs indented
Book mode resets the article into two columns sized from the window, keeping the reader's place. Book typography is the other switch and it ships off: justification and hyphenation belong to print, and on a screen they are a preference rather than an improvement.

02Nothing of yours moves

This is the part that decides whether trying it is cheap, so it is worth being exact about. The theme adds no custom post type, no taxonomy, no database table and no shortcode. Switch away and every post is still a post, in the same place, with the same content.

What it does use is what WordPress already has. The rail in the left gutter is the site's own structure: its menu, its sticky posts under Featured, its categories, its archive and its tags. Featured is sticky posts because the platform already has "this one stays at the top", set per post in the editor. Put a widget in the rail and the widgets are the rail instead. Both are the rail.

The block editor is set up to show the article as a reader will see it: same face, same column width, same code styling. Eight patterns live in their own category and four styles sit on the image block, each of them reaching something the stylesheet already draws and the editor otherwise has no way to ask for.

Three phone screens: the listing, an article, and the listing again with the rail open as a drawer over it
On a phone the gutters fold away and the rail becomes a drawer. Same stylesheet, same markup.

03What it costs a reader

One long article on a local stack, gzipped as served, with no plugins running. The post's own pictures are not counted, because those are your content and not the theme.

Over the wire, one article
First visit152 KB146 KB with the source-code furniture switched off
Every visit after18 KBonly the HTML is fetched again
Fonts68.2 KBfour of the twenty-one faces that ship; a browser takes only the character ranges the page uses
CSS46.9 KB39.0 of it generated from the engine
JavaScript12.0 KBthe engine's own reader bundles, plus WordPress's 1.4 KB reply script
Third-party requests0no CDN, no font host, no tracker, no avatar service

The blog engine serves about 100 KB for the same shape of article, and about 114 KB for the article this theme was measured against. So the theme costs roughly a third more, and the difference is WordPress's markup rather than the stylesheet. That is the honest number and it is the one that belongs next to the comparison page, which quotes the engine's own figure.

The plugins are yours, and so is their weight. These figures are the theme on a bare install. A page that also loads a slider, a consent banner and an analytics script is that page's cost, and no theme can give it back to you.

04What does not carry over

Four things the blog engine draws are not in this theme, and each is a decision with a reason rather than a queue of work.

  • The pen. The highlighter, the pencil underline and the ballpoint ring are markup a WordPress author has no way to write, so the theme does not ship the sheets that style them.
  • Syntax highlighting and footnotes. Same reason. The block editor cannot express them, and a theme that invented a syntax for them would be asking you to write for one theme.
  • Series. WordPress has no series taxonomy, and inventing one in a theme would put content structure into the layer that is supposed to be about looks.
  • Translations. The theme is translation-ready, 160 strings, and ships none. An RTL locale gets a mirrored stylesheet that WordPress links by itself, 3 KB gzipped, paid only by readers who are in one.

Made for one person writing long pieces on their own WordPress. Not made for a magazine front page, a shop, or a site whose design is its photographs.

05Put it on your site

Appearance, then Themes, then Add New, then Upload Theme, then Activate. The zip is one command from a checkout, and there is no build step: the repository is laid out the way WordPress wants it.

from a clone of the theme repository

git archive --format=zip --prefix=quire-ink/ -o quire-ink.zip HEAD:quire-ink

Then Appearance, then Customize, for the palette and the shape. Three controls carry most of the difference between two Quire Ink sites: density, corner radius and heading weight. Appearance, then Menus, puts a menu in the Rail menu location, which is the sidebar, or in Footer menu for a flat row above the credit.

It is in review for the WordPress theme directory, ticket 288845. Until that finishes, the zip above is the way to get it, and it is the same code either way.

06And when you want the engine

The theme gives you the reading page. What it cannot give you is the reason the reading page is cheap: one process, two SQLite files, no plugin system and nothing to patch on a schedule. That part is the blog engine, and moving to it is a smaller job than it sounds.

The importer reads a WordPress export and turns every post into Markdown, sweeping out shortcodes that meant nothing outside their old plugin. The old URL shapes get 301s written for you as the import runs, and every image still hosted on the old site is fetched into your own library straight after, batch by batch, with anything unfetchable named in a list. Clear that list before the old hosting lapses.

Or do not. WordPress has an answer for requirements this software will never have: a shop, memberships, several authors with different powers, a plugin that exists nowhere else. The comparison page says which, name by name, and ends with the cases where Quire Ink is the wrong answer. If you are staying, stay, and keep the reading page.